Recent data from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reveals that Nigeria ranks third among African nations with the highest number of deportations from the U.S. between 2020 and 2025. A total of 437 Nigerian nationals were removed during this period, placing the country behind Senegal (689) and Mauritania (481) in deportation figures.  

The findings shed light on the broader enforcement trends under U.S. immigration law, particularly concerning individuals with criminal records or final deportation orders.  

Understanding the Deportation Process

ICE’s actions are carried out under Title 8 of the U.S. Code, which grants the Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) division the authority to deport noncitizens who have received final removal orders. These orders may stem from visa violations, criminal convictions, or other immigration-related infractions.  

In 2024 alone, the U.S. conducted 271,484 removals, with 32.7% (88,763 individuals) having criminal histories. Offenses ranged from assault and weapons violations to sexual offenses and homicide, underscoring the U.S. government’s focus on removing individuals deemed threats to public safety.  

Nigeria’s Position in the Broader Context

While Nigeria’s deportation numbers are significant, they reflect wider trends in U.S. immigration enforcement. Below is the full ranking of African countries by deportations from 2020 to 2025:  

1. Senegal – 689  

2. Mauritania – 481  

3. Nigeria – 437  

4. Egypt – 387  

5. Ghana – 276  

6. Angola – 227  

7. Cameroon – 166  

8. Guinea – 162  

9. Somalia – 154  

10. Kenya – 131  

The data suggests that West African nations, particularly Senegal and Mauritania, face higher deportation rates, possibly due to migration patterns, visa overstays, or criminal inadmissibility issues.  

Implications for Nigeria and Beyond 

For Nigeria, the figures highlight ongoing challenges related to migration compliance, visa policies, and criminal rehabilitation. Experts suggest that improved legal immigration pathways and bilateral agreements could help mitigate wrongful deportations while ensuring that only those who violate U.S. laws face removal.  

Globally, the statistics reinforce the U.S.’s stringent stance on immigration enforcement, particularly under the Biden administration, which has continued removals of individuals with criminal backgrounds despite calls for more lenient policies.  

Conclusion

As debates over U.S. immigration policies persist, Nigeria’s position on the deportation list serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding international migration. Addressing root causes—such as economic instability, security concerns, and legal migration barriers—could help reduce future deportations and foster better diplomatic relations between nations.