The report, Your journey to a GenAI future: A strategic path to success in banking, is based on findings from a global, cross-industry survey by data and AI leader SAS and Coleman Parkes Research. Among 1,600 business leaders surveyed in 20 countries, 243 were senior banking execs who are decision makers on their organisation’s GenAI strategy. Their insights offer an insider’s look at how banks are implementing GenAI, their biggest challenges, and how banking compares to industries like insurance, the public sector, healthcare, manufacturing, retail and more.
“GenAI is obviously a major trend across sectors right now, but maybe most significantly in financial services,” said Alex Kwiatkowski, Director of Global Financial Services at SAS. “Our survey found that banks, along with insurers, are currently using GenAI at higher rates than other industries. Among the many benefits early adopters are seeing, one of the most oft-cited by banking leaders is in risk management and compliance, where nearly 9 in 10 reported improvements after deploying GenAI.”
Banks are all in on AI, with the budgets to prove it
The interest rates on savings accounts and loan applications may be ticking downward, but banks’ interest in GenAI is as high as ever. In fact, it’s nearly unanimous, with 98% of banking respondents either already using GenAI (60%, tied with insurance for the highest adoption rate) or planning to do so within the next two years (38%). And it’s not just talk: 90% said they have a dedicated GenAI budget for the coming year.
Beyond the 17% of banking leaders who reported fully implementing GenAI into their business processes, another 43% indicated they are experimenting with the technology at the enterprise level. Six in 10 said they have deployed at least one GenAI use case to date – the highest of any industry.
Banks are also using GenAI across departments and business functions. Compared with cross-industry averages, banks use GenAI at a higher rate in marketing (47%), IT (39%), sales (36%), finance (35%) and customer service (24%).
“GenAI technology is a double-edged sword for banks, as it has been weaponised by criminals to commit fraud faster than banks can adopt GenAI to protect their customers,” said Stu Bradley, Senior Vice President of Risk, Fraud and Compliance Solutions at SAS. “But better anti-fraud safeguards are just one of many potential advantages awaiting firms that take the GenAI leap. In fact, leaders on the first wave of GenAI implementation are seeing early returns on their investments in many areas of the bank.”
GenAI is already paying dividends in banking
The benefits from GenAI in banking aren’t just aspirational; they’re already happening, particularly in banks’ internal processes. Among bank leaders that have integrated GenAI, huge majorities are seeing gains in:
- Employee experience and satisfaction (90%)
- Risk management and compliance (88%)
- Time savings and reduced operational costs (85%)
Marketing emerged as the most common area for banks to use GenAI, cited by 47% of banking leaders polled. A related SAS study, based on a separate survey of marketing professionals, found that banking marketers most frequently use GenAI for customer interactions (44%) and generating written copy (33%). They also plan to expand its use within the next year to audience targeting (64%) and trend analysis (64%).
Banking, like other industries, faces obstacles to GenAI success
Like many investments, GenAI does involve a degree of risk and uncertainty. Banking leaders’ foremost concerns involve protecting the privacy (74%) and security (71%) of their – and their customers’ – data. One potential solution? Synthetic data. Nearly one-third (29%) is already using this form of GenAI, and another 33% said they are actively considering.
Implementation challenges are another obstacle facing the banking industry. Over half (54%) said that using public and proprietary data sets has been, or likely will be, an obstacle to implementing GenAI. And nearly as many (49%) said they are experiencing challenges moving GenAI from conceptual to practical.
Finally, banking leaders also worry about GenAI governance and regulation. Only 6% of those surveyed said their current governance framework is “well-established.” Most (58%) indicated that their frameworks are “in development” – but more than a third viewed theirs as either “ad hoc or informal” (27%) or “non-existent” (9%). The biggest hurdles to implementing effective governance and monitoring? Almost one-third (30%) cited technological limitations. Another 30% pointed to lack of transparency and accountability, a number that’s slightly higher than other industries.
“GenAI is changing the world of banking in ways that were previously unimaginable – and at astonishing speed,” said Kwiatkowski. “There is no shortcutting AI governance in banking or any industry. Trustworthy AI requires a foundation of human centricity, and it must embody the other core tenets of responsible innovation – inclusivity, transparency and accountability among them.”
Dig deeper into GenAI insights
To explore additional findings from SAS’ global GenAI study, download the banking report at SAS.com/genai-banking and check out SAS’ interactive GenAI data dashboard.
Join SAS in person at an exclusive forum on Leveraging AI for Financial Inclusion on 21 November 2024 at the Radisson Red, Rosebank. At this forum you will learn from expert panellists how AI and alternative data supports lending to the unbanked and underbanked, hear global experiences in the use of AI/ML in credit risk, using AI to combat fraudsters who use it too, and how reducing operational losses from financial crime can increase a bank’s appetite to be more inclusive. Click to register.