For the umpteenth time, the Tutorial Workers Union of Universities (ASUU) and Nigeria’s Nationwide Data and Expertise Growth Company (NITDA) have renewed their conflicts over the College Transparency and Accountability Options (UTAS) designed by the previous to interchange the federal government’s Built-in Payroll and Personnel Data System (IPPIS) that’s at present in use for the fee of salaries and emoluments.

NITDA had just lately issued a press release, saying UTAS did not cross sure high quality assurance assessments performed by the company.

However the president of ASUU, Emmanuel Osodeke, a professor, mentioned NITDA’s “rush” to the press was to “misinform the general public and politicise the method”.

In keeping with him, NITDA is but to report back to the minister of labour and employment, Chris Ngige, who’s the chief conciliator.

NITDA’s assertion

NITDA wrote within the assertion that; “An in depth Performance/Person Acceptance Take a look at on the platform was carried out by our group. A complete of 687 take a look at circumstances had been generated wherein 529 handed, 156 failed and two cautionary warnings. As among the failed circumstances are crucial to the general performance of the answer, the company couldn’t advocate for the answer to be deployed in a manufacturing setting.”

It added: “Nonetheless, one Medium Threat, three Low Dangers and 44 Informational Dangers had been recognized.”

In the meantime, citing a report issued by NITDA, the PUNCH reported that UTAS handed by 99.3 per cent.

ASUU reacts

Talking to PREMIUM TIMES, Mr Osodeke accused NITDA of intentionally delaying and irritating the method of the adoption of UTAS.

He mentioned the union and NITDA agreed to satisfy on Monday March 28, however NITDA launched its assertion on Saturday when “we’ve got not even completed the method”.

“We now have not even completed the method. We now have not completed for Monday, you have got gone to the press. You haven’t reported again to the physique that requested the testing,” he mentioned in a phone dialog.

Mr Osodeke added that the union declined to signal the doc as a result of NITDA refused to incorporate among the suggestions as “mere” suggestions, as a substitute of tagging them as main in its report.

He mentioned the testing performed on UTAS by NITDA could possibly be completed in three days, however the authorities company instructed ASUU they might solely conduct the testing for 3 hours a day. “That too, excluding weekends.”

“After we obtained there we had been instructed they will solely meet with us from 2 o’clock within the afternoon. They mentioned 2p.m to 4p.m or 2p.m to 5p.m, which is simply three hours a day,” he mentioned.

He added: “We raised the problem that if you already know this factor is essential, why can’t you spend two days and end it? We didn’t know they’d ulterior motives.

“If you happen to look at the press launch by them, they mentioned it took two weeks, simply to create the impression in public that it was completed for lengthy.”

No scorecard

Mr Osodeke mentioned at the start of the method, ASUU requested a template used within the testing and the way NITDA determines when UTAS cross or failed a take a look at, however NITDA instructed them there was no any.

Mr Osodeke likened the scenario to “examin(ing) a scholar and adjudging any rating I like as cross or fail.”

“Does it make sense? You must set a regular. They are saying they don’t have a regular,” he mentioned

He added: “For the primary two days, we requested them to offer us the template for testing in order that we all know at what stage do you say this factor has handed and at what stage do you say it failed?. What can we rating to inform us that you’ve met the minimal, that we are able to transfer on to the following stage, however they are saying they don’t have it. Inform us the indices of crucial significance. They are saying they don’t have any.”

In keeping with Mr Osodeke, NITDA doesn’t perceive the peculiarities of the colleges as one of many objects it requested ASUU to take away from UTAS was its universality, which he famous makes it simpler to incorporate names of individuals with characters.

He mentioned: “In creating the UTAS, we made it versatile such that if somebody comes from China, his identify might be captured, if somebody comes from Israel, his identify might be captured, when the individual is Yoruba when you have got small-small dots all over the identify, it may be captured. However they mentioned due to these ones it didn’t cross.

“We spent a very long time arguing {that a} college just isn’t a nigerian-based organisation solely. It’s common, it must be versatile. However they insisted that we must always take away it and we must always make it English alone. We instructed them to place it in writing that they’re the one directing us to place it in English alone in order that in future once we can not seize someone we’ll maintain you accountable”.

NITDA responds

When PREMIUM TIMES sought NITDA’S response, the pinnacle of company affairs and exterior relations at the company, Hadiza Umar, mentioned: “we’ve got made our stand within the press launch issued final week”.

In keeping with the mentioned assertion launched on March 28, NITDA’S interplay with ASUU has “positively impacted” the performance of UTAS.

“There is no such thing as a doubt that the train has positively impacted on the performance and robustness of the UTAS platform. Moreover, we consider that the interplay availed ASUU the chance to know and respect NITDA’s dedication and stage of professionalism exhibited in finishing up its duties,” the assertion reads partially.

It added: “Contemplating the problem encountered, the evaluation methodology needed to be reviewed to facilitate every day remediation of crucial points as they happen. This, though not in NITDA’s Commonplace Working Process for workouts comparable to this, was adopted. Consideration was made to the nationwide significance connected to the train in addition to the necessity to full it in a fairly shorter time frame.

“The eye of stakeholders and most people is drawn to the necessity for the UTAS platform to be sufficiently strong with key functionalities applied earlier than being deployed to the manufacturing setting.

“Nonetheless, the evaluation revealed that the Resolution, as it’s at present applied, is proscribed.

“There are crucial functionalities that should be applied, examined and handed earlier than the Resolution might be thought-about to satisfy NITDA’s due diligence necessities.

“These areas of enchancment have been totally documented and shared with the ASUU group for mandatory motion. It’s anticipated that ASUU will enhance on the areas recognized, work on the safety points flagged and resubmit the Resolution for additional evaluation.”

‘No work, No pay’

Reacting to the specter of invoking the ‘No work-No pay’ clause by the federal government, the ASUU president mentioned the implication of such a risk is that the most effective arms would proceed to depart the nation.

Mr Osodeke gave an occasion of the inflow of Nigerian medical doctors to different nations, which he mentioned was a results of the same risk by the federal government.

He mentioned: “He (Mr Ngige) declared that with medical doctors after they had been on strike. What occurred? They left. We at the moment are paying for that mouthing by Ngige. That factor he mentioned, Nigeria is paying heavigly for it because the medical doctors are leaving.

“If he continues with what he’s saying, at the tip of the day, the great arms, the great professors will go away the nation, then we pays the worth.

“It’s simply so unlucky we don’t appoint those that have capability to cause, to consider the longer term, to go very crucial sectors of the Nigerian state.”

Backstory

The adoption of UTAS to interchange IPPIS for the fee of workers salaries within the college system is among the calls for by ASUU that should be addressed earlier than it may name off its ongoing three months strike that started on February 14.

Different calls for embody the renegotiation of the 2009 federal government-ASUU settlement on the working situations of Nigerian teachers, the fee of earned tutorial allowances, revitalisation fund for universities, and distortions within the fee of salaries, funding of state universities, and the discharge of white papers on the visitation panels despatched to the colleges.

Whereas the minister of schooling has launched the names of the groups to draft the white papers from the studies of the visitation panels, the federal government is but to inaugurate them to begin work.